Burns v. Anderson, Crenshaw Associates, LLC

Full title: ROBERT BURNS, and BETTY KLINE, Plaintiffs, v. ANDERSON, CRENSHAW…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Nov 15, 2007

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01192-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 15, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01192-WYD-BNB.

November 15, 2007

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on the Defendant's Second Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer [Doc. # 21, filed 10/16/2007] (the "Motion to Amend"). I held a hearing on the Motion to Amend the afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Amend is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

DENIED as withdrawn insofar as the defendant seeks to add the affirmative defenses stated in paragraphs 50 (actions outside the line and scope of employment) and 52 (unjust enrichment); and

GRANTED in all other respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept for filing the Defendant's First Amended Answer and Counterclaim [Doc. # 21-2].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall respond to the Defendant's First Amended Answer and Counterclaim within ten days.