From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnight v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 31, 2011
No. CIV S-08-1894 MCE CHS P (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2011)

Summary

rejecting an identical claim based on a similar record

Summary of this case from Williams v. Wong

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1894 MCE CHS P.

May 31, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus was denied and judgment entered on March 29, 2011. Petitioner filed a timely notice of appeal with respect to that decision and his appeal has been processed to the Ninth Circuit.

Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Petitioner's declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), accordingly his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burnight v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 31, 2011
No. CIV S-08-1894 MCE CHS P (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2011)

rejecting an identical claim based on a similar record

Summary of this case from Williams v. Wong
Case details for

Burnight v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:JON BURNIGHT, Petitioner, v. D. K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 31, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1894 MCE CHS P (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2011)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Wong

Under the circumstances presented here, the state court's rejection of petitioner's First Amendment claim is…