From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burney v. McRainey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jan 31, 2013
1:12CV8 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

1:12CV8

01-31-2013

ROBERT EARL BURNEY, JR., Petitioner, v. MAJOR MCRAINEY, et al., Respondent(s).


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION

The Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge [Docks. ## 33, 39] were filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 16, 2012, and July 23, 2012, respectively, were served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed to either Recommendation within the time limits prescribed by § 636.

The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's "Motion for Injunction Against Any Further Court Proceedings in File #11CRS55181" [Dock. # 32] and Petitioner's "Motion for Injunction" [Dock. # 38] are DENIED without prejudice in light of the Judgment entered on March 1, 2012 [Dock. # 18], and Richardson v. Virginia Dep't of Corr., 437 Fed. Appx. 235 (4th Cir. 2011). This the 31st day of January, 2013

N. Carlton Tilley , Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Burney v. McRainey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jan 31, 2013
1:12CV8 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Burney v. McRainey

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EARL BURNEY, JR., Petitioner, v. MAJOR MCRAINEY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

1:12CV8 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2013)