From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnett v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
May 26, 2016
No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. May. 26, 2016)

Opinion

No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS

05-26-2016

STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. KATHY MILLER, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff appealed the Opinion and Order dismissing this action to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court reversed and remanded for further proceedings concerning Plaintiff's claim of unconstitutional conditions in the medical cell. Burnett v. Miller, No. 14-7069, slip op. at 20-21 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2015) (Dkt. 213).

ACCORDINGLY, the defendants are directed to file within twenty-one (21) days a response to the remanded issue. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days to file a reply to the defendants' response, if appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of May 2016. Dated this 26th day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

Ronald A. White

United Stales District Judge

Eastern District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Burnett v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
May 26, 2016
No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. May. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Burnett v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. KATHY MILLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: May 26, 2016

Citations

No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS (E.D. Okla. May. 26, 2016)