Opinion
No. 14-1518
02-05-2015
CASEY LYNN BURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee, and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Party-in-Interest.
Travis M. Miller, TRAVIS MILLER ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Ihlenfeld, II, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia; Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Stephen Giacchino, Supervisory Attorney, David Leach, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:13-cv-00028-JPB-JES) Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis M. Miller, TRAVIS MILLER ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Ihlenfeld, II, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia; Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Stephen Giacchino, Supervisory Attorney, David Leach, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Casey Lynn Burner (Burner) appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation recommending the district court grant summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to Burner's challenge to the denial of her application for childhood supplemental security income benefits under Subchapter XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1385. After reviewing the briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude there is no reversible error in the district court's decision. Thus, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge, as adopted by the district court. Burner v. Commissioner, No. 2:13-cv-00028, 2014 WL 1479201 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 15, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED