From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnell v. Marine Midland Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 29, 2001
288 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 29, 2001.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (McGill, J.), entered August 28, 2000 in Clinton County, which denied plaintiffs' motion to set aside the verdict.

Livingston L. Hatch, Plattsburgh, for appellants.

Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart Rhodes P.C. (Eileen M. Haynes of counsel), Glens Falls, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


An appeal from a final judgment will bring with it for review an appeal from an intermediate order which necessarily affects the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). This Court has consistently recognized the corollary implicit in this rule, namely, that entry of a final judgment in the action terminates the right to take an appeal from an intermediate order (see, Dubray v. Pratt, 283 A.D.2d 869; Norwest Mtge. v. Clifford, 271 A.D.2d 721; Rivera v. Majuk, 256 A.D.2d 910, 911; Pixel Intl. Network v. State of New York, 255 A.D.2d 666). Accordingly, since the record on appeal reveals that final judgment was entered in this action on April 19, 2001, plaintiffs' appeal from the intermediate order denying their motion to set aside the verdict must be dismissed.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Burnell v. Marine Midland Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 29, 2001
288 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Burnell v. Marine Midland Bank

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BURNELL et al., Appellants, v. MARINE MIDLAND BANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 29, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

Wojcik v. Empire Forklift Inc.

Defendants appeal from the judgment and the order denying their motions for summary judgment. Inasmuch as the…

Piccirilli v. Benjamin

Contrary to plaintiff's contentions, defendant appeals "from the final judgment[, which] brings up for…