From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burmester v. McMaster

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 2169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

1260 CA 20-00783

12-23-2020

In the Matter of Maureen Anne McMaster BURMESTER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Chester Anthony MCMASTER and Raymond Dale McMaster, as Successor Trustees of the Revocable Trust of Gloria Bugni McMaster Juhn, Deceased, Respondents-Appellants.

SESSLER LAW PC, GENESEO (STEVEN D. SESSLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (CURTIS A. JOHNSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.


SESSLER LAW PC, GENESEO (STEVEN D. SESSLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (CURTIS A. JOHNSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, WINSLOW, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

ORDER

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on November 20, 2020,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.


Summaries of

Burmester v. McMaster

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 2169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Burmester v. McMaster

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Maureen Anne McMaster BURMESTER, Petitioner-Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 2169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
134 N.Y.S.3d 872