From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burman Properties v. McKinney

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 4, 1949
174 F.2d 509 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9850.

Argued March 24, 1949.

Decided April 4, 1949.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for the District of Columbia).

Mr. James E. Artis, of Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. James C. Wilkes and George A. Glasgow, both of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. John Courtney Poole, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Dudley G. Skinker, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge, sitting by designation.


We are of the opinion that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia correctly decided this case. The opinion of Judge Proctor, which is reported in 79 F. Supp. 787, sub nom. McKinney v. Burman Properties Inc., is adopted as the opinion of this court.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Burman Properties v. McKinney

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 4, 1949
174 F.2d 509 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Burman Properties v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:BURMAN PROPERTIES, Inc., et al., appellants, v. Roscoe L. McKINNEY et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 1949

Citations

174 F.2d 509 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Dawson v. Barkley, Inc.

Because of the delay in notification to the defendant, because the damages to the defendant would be wholly…