From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burlingame v. Dykeman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1909
88 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued January 29, 1909

Decided February 9, 1909

Hugo Hirsh, Fred W. Buermeyer and Edwin A. Jones for appellant.

Murlin S. Smallwood and Philip V. Fennelly for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: HAIGHT, J.


Summaries of

Burlingame v. Dykeman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1909
88 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Burlingame v. Dykeman

Case Details

Full title:EARL BURLINGAME, Respondent, v . JAMES H. DYKEMAN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 9, 1909

Citations

88 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1909)
88 N.E. 1116