From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burkhimer v. Coble, Comr. of Revenue

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jan 1, 1978
239 S.E.2d 852 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 7725SC120

Filed 17 January 1978

Appeal and Error 41, 45 — appellate rules mandatory Plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Appellate Rules 11 (e) and 28 (b)(3) which are mandatory.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Smith (Donald L.), Judge. Orders entered 14 September 1976 in Superior Court, CALDWELL County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 30 November 1977.

L. H. Wall, for the plaintiff.

Attorney General Edmisten, by Special Deputy Attorney General Myron C. Banks, for the defendants.


This appeal involves a suit filed by plaintiff seeking, inter alia, refund of taxes, damages under 42 USCA 1983, and damages for alleged illegal acts of defendants in collecting taxes. Plaintiff has appealed from orders granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants, granting defendants' request for admission of the genuineness of certain documents, and striking certain of plaintiff's interrogatories.


The record on appeal in this case was settled on 8 December 1976. The transcript of the record on appeal was certified to this Court by the Clerk of Superior Court, Caldwell County, on 11 February 1977, 65 days after settlement of the record on appeal. Appellate Rule 11 (e) requires: "Within 10 days after the record on appeal has been settled . . . the appellant shall present the items constituting the record on appeal to the clerk of superior court for certification."

Plaintiff has failed to refer us to the pertinent assignments of error and exceptions immediately following each question presented in his brief as required by Appellate Rule 28 (b)(3).

The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. White v. Lawrence, 33 N.C. App. 631, 236 S.E.2d 30 (1977). Furthermore, from a cursory reading of the arguments presented in plaintiff's brief, it appears that this appeal has no merit. However, for failure to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, this appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges MARTIN and CLARK concur.


Summaries of

Burkhimer v. Coble, Comr. of Revenue

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jan 1, 1978
239 S.E.2d 852 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Burkhimer v. Coble, Comr. of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:WALTON PETER BURKHIMER v. J. HOWARD COBLE, N.C. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE…

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 1, 1978

Citations

239 S.E.2d 852 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)
239 S.E.2d 852

Citing Cases

Triplett v. Triplett

The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. See Burkhimer v. Coble, Comr. of Revenue, 35 N.C. App. 127,…