From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Tindale

City Court of New York — General Term
Jun 1, 1895
13 Misc. 778 (N.Y. City Ct. 1895)

Opinion

June, 1895.

Hunter Battle, for appellant.

Eustis, Foster Coleman, for respondent.


All the questions involved herein were passed upon by the Court of Common Pleas in an action between the same parties and reported in 12 Misc. 31; 33 N.Y.S. 20.

The judgment herein must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

CONLAN, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Burke v. Tindale

City Court of New York — General Term
Jun 1, 1895
13 Misc. 778 (N.Y. City Ct. 1895)
Case details for

Burke v. Tindale

Case Details

Full title:HARRIET E. BURKE, Respondent, v . TERRY J. TINDALE, Appellant

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1895

Citations

13 Misc. 778 (N.Y. City Ct. 1895)