From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Flagstar Bank

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Aug 17, 2023
Civil Action 4:22-CV-03480 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:22-CV-03480

08-17-2023

MICHAEL BURKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, Defendant.


ORDER

Honorable Alfred H. Bennett Judge.

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho's Memorandum and Recommendation filed on August 2, 2023. Doc. #31. The deadline for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation for clear error. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety.

Therefore, Defendant's Original Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #12) is DENIED as MOOT. Defendant's Superseding Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #16) is GRANTED, and all of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant arc DISMISSED with prejudice. Lastly, Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. #25) is DENIED as MOOT. T his case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burke v. Flagstar Bank

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Aug 17, 2023
Civil Action 4:22-CV-03480 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Burke v. Flagstar Bank

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BURKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 17, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:22-CV-03480 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2023)