From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Ditomas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
2:18-cv-01578-WBS-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01578-WBS-CKD

07-27-2021

MICHELLE BURKE, Plaintiff, v. MICHELE DITOMAS, et al., Defendants.

STANLEY GOFF (Bar No. 289564) Attorneys for Plaintiff


STANLEY GOFF (Bar No. 289564)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX-PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN UNTIMELY OPPOSITION

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After weighing the factors for establishing excusable neglect in timely filing her opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment and for good cause shown, the court grants plaintiffs ex-parte motion (ECF No. 43).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burke v. Ditomas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
2:18-cv-01578-WBS-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Burke v. Ditomas

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE BURKE, Plaintiff, v. MICHELE DITOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 27, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-01578-WBS-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)

Citing Cases

Porter v. Hansen

Second, Mr. Goff has failed to appear for scheduled court hearings more than once. See, e.g., Mins., Wooten…