From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 26, 2023
2:23-cv-0768 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0768 KJN P

09-26-2023

PATRICK BURKE, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint and plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference (ECF No. 17) is denied.

On June 29, 2023, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff appealed the order dismissing his complaint with leave to amend to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 12.) On August 24, 2023, the Ninth Circuit dismissed plaintiff's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 16.) On September 15, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued the mandate. (ECF No. 18.)

On July 28, 2023, plaintiff filed exhibits in support of the complaint. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff contends that these exhibits demonstrate that defendants violated plaintiff's constitutional rights. (Id.)

The pleading filed by plaintiff on July 28, 2023, is not an amended complaint. Piecemeal amendment of complaints is not permitted. See Local Rule 220. The undersigned cannot refer to the exhibits filed by plaintiff on July 28, 2023, in order to determine whether plaintiff's complaint, filed on April 24, 2023, states potentially colorable claims for relief. Accordingly, plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint.

Plaintiff is advised that in an amended complaint he must clearly identify each defendant and the action that defendant took that violated his constitutional rights. The court is not required to review exhibits to determine what plaintiff's charging allegations are as to each named defendant. The charging allegations must be set forth in the amended complaint so defendants have fair notice of the claims plaintiff is presenting.

On September 5, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion for a settlement conference. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference is denied because no defendants have been served.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint within this time will result in the recommendation of dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Burke v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 26, 2023
2:23-cv-0768 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Burke v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK BURKE, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 26, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0768 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2023)