Burke v. Children's Services Division

2 Citing cases

  1. Burke v. Children's Services Division

    288 Or. 533 (Or. 1980)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that agency's adoption of a daycare payment program without undergoing a formal procedure did not make the rule invalid and that the "agency may not rely on its own procedural failures to avoid the necessity of compliance with its rules"

    On review from the Court of Appeals. Appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Charles S. Crookham, Judge. 39 Or. App. 819, 593 P.2d 1262 (1979). Gary Roberts, Legal Aid Service, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Michael H. Marcus and Robert B. Johnstone, Legal Aid Service, Portland.

  2. State v. Cossett

    636 P.2d 442 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

    (1) Termination of probation in case no. 14909 could not effect the termination of probation in case no. 14913. State v. Swain/Goldsmith, 267 Or. 527, 517 P.2d 684 (1974); State v. Hallin, 43 Or. App. 401, 602 P.2d 1134 (1979); Burke v. Children's Serv. Div., 39 Or. App. 819, 823, 593 P.2d 1262 (1979), aff'd 288 Or. 533, 607 P.2d 141 (1980). (2) The judge was acting within his powers on September 30, 1980, in directing the Corrections Division to resume supervision of defendant in case no. 14913 and in directing defendant to show cause.