Opinion
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-06376 EDL
03-18-2013
HENRY M. BURGOYNE, III Plaintiff, v. KARL M. KRONENBERGER, an individual; KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD LLP, a California limited liability partnership; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.
THE LAW OFFICES OF RORY C. QUINTANA Rory C. Quintana Attorney for Plaintiff Henry M. Burgoyne, III ANDERIES & GOMES LLP Shane K. Anderies Attorney for Defendants Karl Kronenberger and Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP
Rory C. Quintana (SBN 258747)
The Law Offices of Rory C. Quintana
201 Spear Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 426-3517
Fax: (415) 426-3518
rcquintana@rcqlegal.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry M. Burgoyne, III
ANDERIES & GOMES LLP
Shane K. Anderies (SBN 215415)
Allan J. Gomes (SBN 225810)
S. Christine Young (SBN 253964)
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 888
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 217-8802
Facsimile: (415) 217-8803
E-Mail: sanderies@andgolaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants Karl Kronenberger and
Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL
FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM
DEFENDANTS KARL KRONENBERGER
AND KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD LLP
AS MODIFIED
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-7(b), 6-1(b), and 6-2(a), the parties agree to continue the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses to Defendants Karl Kronenberger and Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP ("Plaintiff's Motion"). The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion is currently set for April 2, 2013 and the parties agree to continue the hearing to April 9, 2013.
The parties request the hearing date be continued because Plaintiff's counsel and defense counsel are both unavailable to attend the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion on April 2, 2013, due to scheduling conflicts. The hearing date for Plaintiff's Motion was originally set for March 26, 2013 but on March 13, 2013, the Court rescheduled the hearing for April 2, 2013. The requested time modification will have no effect on the schedule for the case.
Based on the forgoing, the parties respectfully request the Court enter an order extending the hearing date on Plaintiff's Motion, as agreed to by the parties.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
THE LAW OFFICES OF RORY C. QUINTANA
By: ___________
Rory C. Quintana
Attorney for Plaintiff Henry M. Burgoyne, III
ANDERIES & GOMES LLP
By: ___________
Shane K. Anderies
Attorney for Defendants Karl Kronenberger and
Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45 §X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.
Respectfully submitted,
By: ___________
Shane K. Anderies
Attorney for Defendants Karl
Kronenberger and Kronenberger
Rosenfeld LLP
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses to Defendants Karl Kronenberger and Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP to be continued to April 9, 2013. at 9:30 a.m.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
______________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IT IS SO ORDERED
AS MODIFIED
Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte