From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgos-Vazquez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 23, 2016
193 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D15–2210.

03-23-2016

Rafael BURGOS–VAZQUEZ and Juan Gomez, Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, National Association, as successor to Washington Mutual Bank, Appellee.

Rafael Burgos–Vazquez and Juan Gomez, Hollywood, pro se. W. Aaron Daniel and Elliot B. Kula of Kula & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellee.


Rafael Burgos–Vazquez and Juan Gomez, Hollywood, pro se.

W. Aaron Daniel and Elliot B. Kula of Kula & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Juan Gomez, the sole defendant in the underlying foreclosure case, and Rafael Burgos–Vazquez, who has joined in the appeal despite not having been a party to the underlying action, claim to challenge an order rendered on May 7, 2015, denying Mr. Gomez's motion to cancel the foreclosure sale. This order itself is non-final and non-appealable. Moreover, the initial brief on appeal raises issues solely addressed to the final judgment of foreclosure entered on January 5, 2009. This appeal is untimely from the final judgment. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Burgos-Vazquez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 23, 2016
193 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Burgos-Vazquez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:Rafael BURGOS–VAZQUEZ and Juan Gomez, Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

193 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)