From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgos v. Alamo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2007
44 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1843.

October 25, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered March 12, 2007, which denied the motion by defendants Alamo and Rivera for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young Yagerman, P.C., New York (Louis H. Klein of counsel), for appellants.

Thomas W. Russo, P.C., Bronx, (Thomas W. Russo of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


The proof on defendants' motion consisted mainly of deposition transcripts of the passengers and the adverse codefendant driver, but did not sufficiently demonstrate who was liable for the accident ( see e.g. Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).


Summaries of

Burgos v. Alamo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2007
44 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Burgos v. Alamo

Case Details

Full title:ARLENE BURGOS et al., Respondents, v. ALAMO FINANCING LLP et al…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 25, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8015
843 N.Y.S.2d 509