From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgoon v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 25, 2024
No. 4749-24S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 25, 2024)

Opinion

4749-24S

06-25-2024

WILLIAM J. BURGOON & MARY M. BURGOON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On March 27, 2024, the Petition to commence this case was filed. Listed in the Petition as petitioners' counsel is Matthew M. Jacob, who is not admitted to practice before this Court. By Order served June 24, 2024, the Court advised petitioners that Mr. Jacob could not represent them before this Court.

On June 24, 2024, petitioners filed a document titled "Administrative Record", which consists of a copy of a letter from the Internal Revenue Service to Mr Jacob informing him that his application for renewal of his enrolled agent status had been renewed. However, this Court is separate and independent from the IRS. While Mr. Jacob may be able to represent petitioners before the IRS, because Mr. Jacob has not been admitted to practice before this Court he may not file documents or appear on petitioners' behalf in this case.

Upon due consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Administrative Record, filed June 24, 2024, is stricken from the Court's record in this case.


Summaries of

Burgoon v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 25, 2024
No. 4749-24S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Burgoon v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. BURGOON & MARY M. BURGOON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 25, 2024

Citations

No. 4749-24S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 25, 2024)