From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 1, 2014
No. 05-14-00216-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00216-CR

10-01-2014

NATHAN EARL BURGESS, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 001-86625-2012

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant's September 15, 2014 pro se motion to recuse Justice Myers. Appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981). Accordingly, the Court DENIES appellant's pro se motion to recuse.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to William Schultz and John Rolater.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Burgess v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 1, 2014
No. 05-14-00216-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Burgess v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN EARL BURGESS, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Oct 1, 2014

Citations

No. 05-14-00216-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2014)