From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Ruttenburg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 17, 2003
61 F. App'x 460 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


61 Fed.Appx. 460 (9th Cir. 2003) Reginald P. BURGESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary M. RUTTENBURG; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-55892. D.C. No. CV-02-01043-DDP. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 17, 2003

Submitted April 7, 2003.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Burgess's request for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BROWNING, RYMER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reginald P. Burgess appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing with prejudice his action challenging a state court order appointing a probate conservator. Burgess contends the district court erred by vacating his notice of voluntary dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the district court may vacate a voluntary dismissal. Amer. Soccer Co. v. Score First Enters., 187 F.3d 1108, 1109-10 (9th Cir.1999). We reverse and remand.

Because Burgess filed a notice of voluntary dismissal before defendants filed an answer or moved for summary judgment, he had an "absolute right" to a dismissal without prejudice and without judicial involvement. See id. at 1110. Therefore, we reverse the judgment dismissing with prejudice and order the case dismissed without prejudice. See id. at 1112.

Burgess's request for judicial notice is denied.

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Burgess v. Ruttenburg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 17, 2003
61 F. App'x 460 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Burgess v. Ruttenburg

Case Details

Full title:Reginald P. BURGESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary M. RUTTENBURG; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 17, 2003

Citations

61 F. App'x 460 (9th Cir. 2003)