From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Runnels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. Civ. S 03-1196 GEB GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. Civ. S 03-1196 GEB GGH

07-09-2012

CHRISTOPHER DANIEL BURGESS, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender DAVID M. PORTER, Bar #127024 Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Petitioner CHRISTOPHER DANIEL BURGESS


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

DAVID M. PORTER, Bar #127024

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Petitioner

CHRISTOPHER DANIEL BURGESS

UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE

FOR FILING STATUS REPORT;

ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-142, petitioner, CHRISTOPHER DANIEL BURGESS, by and through his counsel, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, hereby requests a 45-day extension of time to file a status report.

On May 25, 2012, the Court is ordered the Federal Defender's Office to appoint new counsel to represent petitioner and provide a status report within 45 days describing how the case will proceed. Because of delays associated with the fact that the court file had been archived, the substitution of counsel order appointing Barry Morris as counsel for petitioner was not filed until July 6, 2012. Because Mr. Morris will soon be leaving the country on a vacation, he has requested that the deadline for filing the status report be extended for 45 days, until August 23, 2012.

The undersigned has contacted counsel for respondent, Deputy Attorney General Angelo Sipin Edralin, Jr., and he graciously indicated that he has no objection to the proposed extension. This is petitioner's first request for an extension, and it is not being interposed to cause undue delay, to gain unfair advantage, or for any other improper purpose.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Mr. Burgess requests the Court enter the order lodged herewith.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

_________________________

DAVID M. PORTER

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Petitioner

CHRISTOPHER DANIEL BURGESS

ORDER

Pursuant to the unopposed request of petitioner, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status report describing how this case will proceed shall be filed on or before August 23, 2012.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Burgess v. Runnels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. Civ. S 03-1196 GEB GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Burgess v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER DANIEL BURGESS, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. Civ. S 03-1196 GEB GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)