From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
2:22-CV-0573-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-0573-JAM-DMC-P

06-14-2022

DWAYNE LAMONT BURGESS, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has initiated this action with what he captions a “Motion for Relief from Judgement” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure “60(a)(b).” The matter has been opened on the Court's docket as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 7. Petitioner has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that Petitioner is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 7, is granted.


Summaries of

Burgess v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2022
2:22-CV-0573-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Burgess v. People

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE LAMONT BURGESS, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-0573-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2022)