From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Sep 1, 2022
3:21-cv-00616-MMA-MSB (S.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00616-MMA-MSB

09-01-2022

Matthew Burgess, Plaintiff, v. County of San Diego, et al., Defendants.

MARA W. ELLIOTI, City Attorney M. TRAVIS PHELPS, Assistant City Attorney ORLANDO P ALIZZOLO, Deputy City Attorney Chris Wright Senior Claims Representative Defendant City of San Diego Seetal Tejura, Esq. Substituted Attorney Orlando Palizzolo, Esq Substituting Attorney


MARA W. ELLIOTI, City Attorney M. TRAVIS PHELPS, Assistant City Attorney ORLANDO P ALIZZOLO, Deputy City Attorney

Chris Wright Senior Claims Representative Defendant City of San Diego

Seetal Tejura, Esq. Substituted Attorney

Orlando Palizzolo, Esq Substituting Attorney

CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

Honorable Michael S. Berg United States Magistrate Judge

Notice is hereby given that, subject to approval by the Court, Defendant City of San Diego and Defendant Jeremy Huff substitute Orlando Palizzolo, State Bar Number 308423, as counsel of record in place of Seetal Tejura, Esq. Contact information for new counsel is as follows:

The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burgess v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Sep 1, 2022
3:21-cv-00616-MMA-MSB (S.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Burgess v. Cnty. of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:Matthew Burgess, Plaintiff, v. County of San Diego, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00616-MMA-MSB (S.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2022)