From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 21, 2022
21cv616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

21cv616-MMA (MSB)

03-21-2022

MATTHEW BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH MODIFICATION [ECF NO. 27]

Honorable Michael S. Berg United States Magistrate Judge

On March 21, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion asking the Court to enter their Protective Order. (ECF No. 27.) The Court has considered the Proposed Protective Order and, for good cause shown, GRANTS the joint motion and ENTERS the Proposed Protective Order [ECF No. 27-1] with the following modification:

1. Paragraph 15 is hereby modified to read as follows: “Unless superseded by later order, this Order shall remain in full force and effect after the termination of this Action and the Parties agree that the Court may enforce the terms of this Order and/or redress any violations thereof for a period of one (1) year after the conclusion of the case.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burgess v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 21, 2022
21cv616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Burgess v. Cnty. of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

21cv616-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2022)