Opinion
Motion No 2022-00869 Index No. 24259/2011
01-30-2023
Valerie P. Burgess, etc., plaintiff-respondent, v. City of New York, et al., respondents-appellants, JLG Industries, Inc., appellant-respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
M287113
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, JOSEPH J. MALTESE. HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 4, 2022. Motion by the respondent-appellant City of New York to extend the time to serve and file an answering brief and a reply brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to file an answering brief is granted, and on or before February 14, 2023, the respondent-appellant City of New York shall serve and file its answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][1][iv]), via NYSCEF, if applicable, or if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the answering brief and upload a digital copy of the answering brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further, ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to serve and file a reply brief is denied.
DILLON, J.P., RIVERA, MALTESE and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.