From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

finding that the homeowners' association conceded that recovery of certain unpaid association dues was barred by the six-year SOL

Summary of this case from In re Nw. Bay Partners

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court's limitation of disclosure to those incidents that took place in the area of the ramp where the plaintiff was injured was within that court's sound discretion and should not be disturbed (see, Kolody v. Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 163 A.D.2d 276; Zimmerman v. New York City Tr. Auth., 115 A.D.2d 738; Jackson v. Nelson, 81 A.D.2d 677; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 5501.22). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Burgess v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

finding that the homeowners' association conceded that recovery of certain unpaid association dues was barred by the six-year SOL

Summary of this case from In re Nw. Bay Partners
Case details for

Burgess v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CAREEFE BURGESS, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, DAWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 170

Citing Cases

In re Nw. Bay Partners

When dealing with assessment dues, a separate breach of contract occurs each year that the Debtor fails to…