Burgess v. Burgess

1 Citing case

  1. Hendrix v. Hendrix

    163 S.E.2d 917 (Ga. 1968)   Cited 6 times

    Where, as here, title to the property was in dispute and the evidence was in conflict, the jury was authorized to find from the evidence that the husband expended his funds in reliance on the promise of the wife to deed him one half of the property and was authorized to award to him the property described in the judgment on condition that he pay the wife $2,500. Price v. Price, 205 Ga. 623 (1) ( 54 S.E.2d 578); Davis v. Davis, 216 Ga. 305, 309 (2) ( 116 S.E.2d 219); Ashbaugh v. Ashbaugh, 222 Ga. 811 (1) ( 152 S.E.2d 888); and Burgess v. Burgess, 224 Ga. 180 ( 160 S.E.2d 589). The charges of the court conformed to the law and the evidence and were not erroneous.