From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Bank of America

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 20, 2009
NO. 3:09-00737 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 3:09-00737.

November 20, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to which no objections have been lodged within the time required. After independently reviewing the Magistrate Judge's findings and the entire record, the Court finds that the findings and conclusions are correct and are adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Defendant's motion to enforce settlement agreement (Docket Entry No. 29) is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's motion (Docket Entry No. 36) is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The entry of this Order and the Order (Docket Entry No. 43) shall constitute the judgment in this action. An appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445-446 (1962). Therefore, the plaintiff is not certified to pursue an appeal of those claims dismissed as frivolous in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burgess v. Bank of America

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 20, 2009
NO. 3:09-00737 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Burgess v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:SHAWNELIAS BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2009

Citations

NO. 3:09-00737 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2009)