From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 31, 2017
SC: 156271 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 156276

10-31-2017

VINCENT BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices AGC: 17-1856;17-1859

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 31, 2017
SC: 156271 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

Citations

SC: 156271 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)