From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burger v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00102-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00102-AP

04-16-2012

MARK DAVID BURGER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Plaintiff.

Bruce C. Bernstein For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

For Plaintiff:

Bruce C. Bernstein, P.C.

Bruce C. Bernstein

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

Debra J. Meachum

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 1/13/12.

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 2/7/12.

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 3/26/12.

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

Plaintiff states: upon preliminary review, it appears to be adequate.

Defendant states, to the best of his knowledge, that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

None at this time.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

None at this time.

7. OTHER MATTERS

None at this time.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 5/22/12

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 6/21/12

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 7/6/12

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff will address this matter in his opening brief.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:

For Plaintiff:

Bruce C. Bernstein

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

By: Debra J. Meachum

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration


Summaries of

Burger v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00102-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Burger v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARK DAVID BURGER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00102-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 16, 2012)