From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgdorf v. Fitch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2134 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2134 MCE CKD P

11-13-2012

DANIEL CRAIG BURGDORF, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN FITCH, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed September 17, 2012, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Burgdorf v. Fitch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2134 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Burgdorf v. Fitch

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL CRAIG BURGDORF, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN FITCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2134 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2012)