From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burdge v. Hill

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1860
15 Cal. 198 (Cal. 1860)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Eleventh District.

         There was no statement on appeal, but a statement used on motion for new trial. The appeal was from the judgment alone.

         COUNSEL

          Thos. Sunderland, for Appellant.

          Tuttle & Hillyer, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Field, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., and Cope, J., concurring.

         OPINION

         FIELD, Judge

         The statement contained in the record was used on the motion for a new trial, and we can only examine the action of the Court below in denying the motion. The judgment cannot be reviewed except through the order made upon the motion, and from such order there is no appeal. (Lower v. Knox, 10 Cal. 480 .) This leaves the case to stand upon the judgment roll, and as this discloses no error, the judgment must be affirmed.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Burdge v. Hill

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1860
15 Cal. 198 (Cal. 1860)
Case details for

Burdge v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:BURDGE v. GOLD HILL & BEAR RIVER WATER CO.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1860

Citations

15 Cal. 198 (Cal. 1860)