From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burdette v. Crawford County

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Nov 17, 2008
Case No. 08-2109 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 08-2109.

November 17, 2008


ORDER


Now on this 17th day of November 2008, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on October 22, 2008, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has filed objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc. 9). The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for a writ of mandamus is legally frivolous and abstention under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) is appropriate. Accordingly Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED as to all Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burdette v. Crawford County

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Nov 17, 2008
Case No. 08-2109 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Burdette v. Crawford County

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY D. BURDETTE PLAINTIFF v. CRAWFORD COUNTY; CITY OF VAN BUREN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: Nov 17, 2008

Citations

Case No. 08-2109 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

King v. Harmon

The plaintiff must recover on his case as laid, and when it is not proved, or precludes recovery, it is…

Haslerig v. Watson

The excerpts from the charge here complained of went outside the contentions of the plaintiffs as set up in…