Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Burchfield v. Madrie

241 Ga. App. 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Burchfield v. Madrie

5 Citing cases

  1. HA&W Financial Advisors, LLC v. Johnson

    336 Ga. App. 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 6 times
    Declining to rule on issue of whether trial court erred by failing to segregate attorney fee award where issue was not raised nor ruled on in trial court

    See Burchfield v. Madrie, 241 Ga.App. 39, 42(4), 524 S.E.2d 798 (1999) (any error in charge on nominal damages was harmless because "the jury failed to award any damages whatsoever"). 4.

  2. Royalston v. Middlebrooks

    696 S.E.2d 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 5 times
    Upholding denials of motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on punitive damages when the employer had no motor vehicle reports in the defendant employee's records

    (Footnote omitted.) Burchfield v. Madrie, 241 Ga. App. 39,42 (2) ( 524 SE2d 798) (1999). Id.

  3. Murray v. Gardner

    578 S.E.2d 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 1 times

    We will affirm the trial court's ruling if any evidence supports the verdict. See Burchfield v. Madrie, 241 Ga. App. 39, 41(2) ( 524 S.E.2d 798) (1999). See id.

  4. Webb v. Thomas Trucking, Inc.

    566 S.E.2d 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 3 times

    Because the jury declined to award any damages whatsoever, this charge was not harmful even if it was error. See Burchfield v. Madrie, 241 Ga. App. 39, 42(4) ( 524 S.E.2d 798) (1999); Minter v. Leary, 181 Ga. App. 801 (1) ( 354 S.E.2d 185) (1987) (physical precedent only). 3. The trial court properly excluded testimony from Davis regarding opinion evidence as to the monetary value of the physical damage to her vehicle as a result of the collision.

  5. Williamson v. Harvey Smith Inc.

    246 Ga. App. 745 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 26 times
    Explaining that the party seeking fees has "the burden of proof and must segregate out the hours that are recoverable from those hours not recoverable"

    (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Burchfield v. Madrie, 241 Ga. App. 39, 42 (2) ( 524 S.E.2d 798) (1999). Moreover, we note that the provision upon which the Williamsons rely also provides that the project was to "be considered completed and ready to close upon issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Final Inspection Certificate issued by the city or county in which the Property lies.