From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BURBAGE v. DAZY

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1851
5 Del. 324 (Del. Super. Ct. 1851)

Opinion

Spring Sessions, 1851.

TRESPASS quare clausum fregit.


Mr. Layton asked for a writ of estrepement founded on an affidavit that defendants were about to cut timber on his land and trees to pay taxes assessed for the laying out and cutting a ditch, under an order of court. The defendants were ditch commissioners.

The Court refused to award the writ. It is a writ grantable only in real actions, and in the action of ejectment to which it was extended by the act of 1829. ( Digest. 167; Higgins' lessee vs. Phillips, 3 Harr. Rep., 49.)


Summaries of

BURBAGE v. DAZY

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1851
5 Del. 324 (Del. Super. Ct. 1851)
Case details for

BURBAGE v. DAZY

Case Details

Full title:HENRY BURBAGE vs. THOMAS DAZY et al

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1851

Citations

5 Del. 324 (Del. Super. Ct. 1851)