From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bur. of Traffic Safety v. Kintigh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 4, 1980
415 A.2d 436 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)

Opinion

Argued May 7, 1980

June 4, 1980.

Motor vehicles — Operator's license — Suspension — Review.

1. Where a motor vehicle operator's license suspension appeal is actually an attempt to attack a defect in the criminal proceeding which ultimately resulted in the suspension, the appeal must be dismissed; review is limited to the order of suspension, which is deemed a civil proceeding, and does not extend to the criminal conviction which prompted the suspension. [13]

Argued May 7, 1980, before Judges WILKINSON, JR., CRAIG and WILLIAMS, JR., sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 893 C.D. 1978, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Timothy C. Kintigh, No. SA 112 of 1978.

Suspension of motor vehicle operator's license by Secretary of Transportation. Licensee appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Appeal sustained. WATSON, J. Department of Transportation appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Reversed.

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Attorney General, with him Robert W. Cunliffe, Deputy Attorney General, and Robert P. Kane and Edward G. Biester, Jr., Attorneys General, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County setting aside a suspension of the vehicle operating privileges of Timothy Kintigh (appellee).

Appellee pleaded guilty to charges of "racing", a summary offense under the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 3367. The Department of Transportation, on receipt of notification of his conviction, issued appellee notice of the six-month license suspension mandated by 75 Pa. C.S. § 1532(b).

On appeal to the court of common pleas, appellee asserted that he was misled into a plea of guilty by the arresting officer's statement that payment of the two-hundred dollar fine and costs would be "the only thing that was involved." Appellee contended that, because he had no notice of the impending suspension at the time of the plea, the imposition of the suspension was illegal.

This case is controlled by our decisions in Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Grobes, 45 Pa. Commw. 151, 405 A.2d 588 (1979), and Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Lea, 34 Pa. Commw. 310, 384 A.2d 269 (1979). Where a license suspension appeal is actually an attempt to attack a defect in the criminal proceeding which ultimately resulted in the suspension, the appeal must be dismissed. Review is limited to the order of suspension, which is deemed a civil proceeding, and does not extend to the criminal conviction which prompted the suspension.

We reverse the order of the lower court and order the Department of Transportation to reinstate the suspension within a reasonable time.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 1980, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Civil Division (No. SA 112 of 1978) dated April 4, 1978, is reversed. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation is ordered to reinstate the suspension of Timothy C. Kintigh within a reasonable time.


Summaries of

Bur. of Traffic Safety v. Kintigh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 4, 1980
415 A.2d 436 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)
Case details for

Bur. of Traffic Safety v. Kintigh

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 4, 1980

Citations

415 A.2d 436 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)
415 A.2d 436

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Padilla

It is well settled that a license suspension appeal is limited to a review of the order of suspension and…

Oden v. Com. of Penna

In the present appeal, appellant's guilty plea may have been set aside if appellant had been induced, by DOT,…