From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunton v. Douglas

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division
Jan 12, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:06cv264 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:06cv264.

January 12, 2007


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT


The Plaintiff Dedrick Bunton, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

On October 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge ordered Bunton to pay an initial partial filing fee of $18.88, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Bunton received a copy of this order on October 24, 2006, but did not comply, nor has he responded in any way.

On December 5, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Bunton received a copy of this Report on December 7, 2006, but filed no objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected — to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court.Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) ( en banc).

The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings and documents in this case, as well as the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has concluded that the Reports of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action be and hereby is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. It is further

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED.


Summaries of

Bunton v. Douglas

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division
Jan 12, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:06cv264 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Bunton v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:DEDRICK BUNTON v. TINA DOUGLAS, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division

Date published: Jan 12, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:06cv264 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2007)