From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bumford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 6, 1941
14 S.E.2d 611 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)

Opinion

28948, 28949, 28950.

DECIDED MAY 6, 1941.

Obstructing railroad track; from Houston superior court — Judge Anderson. December 23, 1940.

A. T. Walden, for plaintiffs in error.

Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.


Rulings on sufficiency of evidence to sustain convictions of obstructing railroad-track.

DECIDED MAY 6, 1941.


These defendants were jointly convicted of obstructing a railroad-track. Their motions for new trial were overruled. Each of them filed a bill of exceptions. The evidence against each of them was substantially the same, save that the jury were authorized to find that Carpenter and Walker had made confessions. As to Bumford, no confession was offered in evidence. But for the confessions there was no sufficient evidence to convict Carpenter and Walker. The corpus delicti was proved. This proof in connection with the confessions was sufficient to convict Carpenter and Walker. The evidence was only circumstantial as to Bumford, and was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

Judgment reversed in 28948. Judgments affirmed in 28949 and 28950. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bumford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 6, 1941
14 S.E.2d 611 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)
Case details for

Bumford v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUMFORD v. THE STATE. CARPENTER v. THE STATE. WALKER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 6, 1941

Citations

14 S.E.2d 611 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)
14 S.E.2d 611