From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bumby Stimpson v. S. Reinforcing

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 26, 1977
348 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1974.

July 26, 1977.

Appeal from the Broward County Circuit Court, George W. Tedder, Jr., J.

Charles R. Stepter, Jr. of Fishback, Davis, Dominick Simonet, Orlando, for appellant.

Michael P. Smodish of Reed Smodish, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellee.


Based upon a review of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that there exist issues of triable fact which preclude the entry of summary judgment. Shaffran v. Holness, 93 So.2d 94 (Fla. 1957); Nance v. Ball, 134 So.2d 35 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Coquina Ridge Properties v. East West Company, 255 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). For example, the existence or nonexistence of a contract between the parties as well as the presence or absence of a unilateral mistake are such issues that do not lend themselves to summary disposition. We further conclude that the doctrine of promissory estoppel, as delineated in Drennan v. Star Paving Co., 51 Cal.2d 409, 333 P.2d 757 (1958), (but see Southeastern Sales Service Co. v. T.T. Watson, Inc., 172 So.2d 239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)) should be considered and applied as the facts suggest after a hearing on the merits. Accordingly, the summary final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MAGER, C.J., LETTS, J., and MOUNTS, MARVIN U., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Bumby Stimpson v. S. Reinforcing

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 26, 1977
348 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Bumby Stimpson v. S. Reinforcing

Case Details

Full title:BUMBY STIMPSON, INC., APPELLANT, v. SOUTHERN REINFORCING STEEL CO., INC…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 26, 1977

Citations

348 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Marholin v. Kaye

We reverse a summary judgment in favor of an attorney in a malpractice action based on the running of the…

Loranger Construction Corp. v. E.F. Hauserman Co.

We do not use the expression "promissory estoppel," since it tends to confusion rather than clarity. Cases…