From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bulterman v. Richmond Racquet Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1982
87 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

April 19, 1982


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Conhagen appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rubin, J.), dated June 30, 1980, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed as against defendant Conhagen. The record reveals that the plaintiff has failed to raise or establish a triable issue of fact regarding whether defendant Conhagen may be estopped from asserting the affirmative defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and the Statute of Limitations (cf. Fotochrome, Inc. v. American Ins. Co., 26 A.D.2d 634, affd 23 N.Y.2d 889; Adelman v. Friedman, 80 Misc.2d 946, affd 83 Misc.2d 802). As defendant Conhagen was never properly served (CPLR 308, 313 PLR) jurisdiction over him was never obtained and the complaint must therefore be dismissed as against him. Mangano, J.P., Gulotta, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bulterman v. Richmond Racquet Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1982
87 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Bulterman v. Richmond Racquet Club

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS BULTERMAN, Respondent, v. RICHMOND RACQUET CLUB, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1982

Citations

87 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)