Opinion
No. 72219
OPINION FILED: March 3, 1998 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 29, 1997.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE EDWARD M. PEEK, JUDGE.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for defendant-movant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
ORDER
Reginald Bullock, Movant, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief on the grounds that the motion court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).