From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bullock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Mar 3, 1998
964 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72219

OPINION FILED: March 3, 1998 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 29, 1997.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE EDWARD M. PEEK, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for defendant-movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.



ORDER


Reginald Bullock, Movant, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief on the grounds that the motion court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bullock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Mar 3, 1998
964 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Bullock v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD BULLOCK, DEFENDANT-MOVANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Mar 3, 1998

Citations

964 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)