Bullock v. District of Columbia

Full title: MATTHEW BULLOCK, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Mar 31, 2011

Civil Action No. 10-0034 (RLW) (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-0034 (RLW).

March 31, 2011

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT WILKINS, District Judge

On February 9, 2011, the defendants filed a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment under Rules 12(c) and 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by February 10, 2001, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the defendants' motion as conceded, dismiss all claims (Counts I-VII) against the District of Columbia, and dismiss the claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and negligence (Counts V-VI) against Carlos Heraud. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.