Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Bullins v. State

868 So. 2d 1045 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Bullins v. State

6 Citing cases

  1. Mosby v. State

    134 So. 3d 850 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 7 times
    Finding that the victim's testimony that he was fondled "in the months prior to his moving to Oklahoma in January 2006" and evidence that the victim "was fondled the last time he stayed with [the defendant] in ... late February or early March 2006" was sufficient to place defendant's conduct within the September 1, 2005 through March 2006 charged time frame in order to sustain defendant's convictions

    A motion for a JNOV implicates the legal sufficiency of the evidence. Arbuckle v. State, 894 So.2d 619, 622 (¶ 16) (Miss.Ct.App.2004) (citing Bullins v. State, 868 So.2d 1045, 1048 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App.2004)). The Mississippi Supreme Court has held that “[w]hen reviewing a case for the sufficiency of the evidence, ‘the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ”

  2. Terry v. State

    126 So. 3d 946 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    A motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict implicates the legal sufficiency of the evidence. Arbuckle v. State, 894 So.2d 619, 622 (¶ 16) (Miss.Ct.App.2004) (citing Bullins v. State, 868 So.2d 1045, 1048 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App.2004)). The Mississippi Supreme Court has held that “[w]hen reviewing a case for the sufficiency of the evidence, ‘the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ”

  3. Kiker v. State

    919 So. 2d 190 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 9 times

    ¶ 21. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict implicate the sufficiency of the evidence. Bullins v. State, 868 So.2d 1045, 1048 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App. 2004). Our standard of review on the question of the legal sufficiency of the evidence is clearly defined.

  4. Arbuckle v. State

    894 So. 2d 619 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 7 times
    Affirming joint and several restitution in burglary of a dwelling and simple assault conviction

    Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict implicate the sufficiency of the evidence. Bullins v. State, 868 So.2d 1045, 1048 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App. 2004). Our standard of review on the question of the legal sufficiency of the evidence is clearly defined.

  5. Cox v. State

    887 So. 2d 190 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004)

    Cox argues that the videotape introduced by the prosecution did not show cocaine being exchanged between the parties. ¶ 5. Recently, in Bullins v. State, 868 So.2d 1045, 1046 (Miss.Ct.App. 2004), the defendant was charged with and convicted of the sale of cocaine. After the trial court denied his motion for JNOV and new trial, Bullins appealed claiming that the videotape did not show the drug exchange.

  6. Carr v. State

    880 So. 2d 1079 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 1 times

    ¶ 24. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict implicate the sufficiency of the evidence. Bullins v. State, 868 So.2d 1045, 1048 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App. 2004). Our standard of review on the question of the legal sufficiency of the evidence is clearly defined.