From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bullard v. Young

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 25, 2013
510 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7538

02-25-2013

CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; TONY GINOR SAMPSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG, Defendant - Appellee.

Christopher Bullard, Tony Ginor Sampson, Appellants Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03093-FL) Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Bullard, Tony Ginor Sampson, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny Appellants' motion to compel an answer and for grant of motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bullard v. Young

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 25, 2013
510 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Bullard v. Young

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; TONY GINOR SAMPSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

510 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2013)