Opinion
04-23-01095-CV
02-01-2024
Daniel BULLARD, Appellant v. Shannon HUDSON, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CV06019 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Irene Rios, Justice
This is an appeal in a forcible detainer action in which the clerk's record shows the county court at law signed a judgment of possession in favor of appellee on November 20, 2023. The clerk's record does not show that appellant paid a supersedeas bond to stay execution of the judgment. The record shows the county court at law subsequently issued a writ of possession to enforce the November 20 judgment, and the writ of possession was executed on January 2, 2024.
The only issue in a forcible detainer action is the right to actual possession of the property. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 510.3(e); Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of the City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex. 2006); see also Tex. Prop. Code Ann. §§ 24.001-.002. A judgment of possession in such an action determines only the right to immediate possession and is not a final determination of whether an eviction was wrongful. Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787. When a forcible detainer defendant fails to pay a supersedeas bond in the amount set by the county court at law, the judgment may be enforced and a writ of possession may be executed, evicting the defendant from the property. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007; Tex.R.Civ.P. 510.13; Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 786. If a forcible detainer defendant fails to supersede the judgment and loses possession of the property, the appeal is moot unless he: (1) timely and clearly expressed his intent to appeal; and (2) asserted "a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the [property]." See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 786-87.
Because the record appears to show that appellant did not pay a supersedeas bond to stay execution of the November 20, 2023 judgment and that the writ of possession was subsequently executed, this appeal may be moot. We therefore ORDER appellant to file a written response by February 12, 2024 explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this court.