From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bulic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 10, 2008
254 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89967.

June 10, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Julian Bush, Judge.

S. Kristina Starke, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Roger W. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.



ORDER


Dzevad Bulic appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bulic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 10, 2008
254 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Bulic v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dzevad BULIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 10, 2008

Citations

254 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)