Opinion
2:10-CV-00191-PMP-PAL.
June 24, 2010
ORDER
Having considered the fully briefed arguments set forth in Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order (Doc. #3), filed on February 3, 2010, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) filed April 20, 2010, including the Supplemental Briefing filed by the parties on June 3, 2010, (Doc. #23, #24), as well as the arguments presented at the hearing conducted June 1, 2010, (Doc. #22) and good cause appearing,
The Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order (Doc. #3) must be denied and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) must be granted.
For the reasons set forth in Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) and Reply Memorandum (Doc. #21), each of Plaintiff's claims for relief is without merit. Moreover, because Plaintiff's Complaint is subject to dismissal, Plaintiff cannot demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits which would warrant the issuance of injunctive relief.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Release Lis Pendens (Doc. #17) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Nuzhat Bukhari.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order (Doc. #3) is DENIED.