From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buk v. Mauro

United States District Court, District of Utah
Jul 12, 2022
2:22-CV-141 TS (D. Utah Jul. 12, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-141 TS

07-12-2022

BUK MAWUT BUK, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD P. MAURO et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER

Ted Stewart District Judge

Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's May 11, 2022, order to within thirty days show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's order to submit an initial partial filing fee. And, if needed, Plaintiff has not since updated his address with the Court as required. See D. Utah Civ. R. 83-1.3(e) ("In all cases, counsel and parties appearing pro se must notify the clerk's office immediately of any change in address, email address, or telephone number.").

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that--for failure to obey the Court's order and to prosecute this case--Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See DUCivR 41-2. This action is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Buk v. Mauro

United States District Court, District of Utah
Jul 12, 2022
2:22-CV-141 TS (D. Utah Jul. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Buk v. Mauro

Case Details

Full title:BUK MAWUT BUK, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD P. MAURO et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Utah

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-141 TS (D. Utah Jul. 12, 2022)