From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bui v. Sprint Corporation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)

Opinion


VIET BUI, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated employees, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, a SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware Corporation; SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC United States District Court, E.D. California. March 6, 2015

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         The Court has reviewed the Proposed Intervenors' Ex Parte Application to stay the mediation that the Bui Parties have scheduled for March 9, 2015, until after the Court issues an order on Proposed Intervenors' Motion, currently before the Court. (ECF No. 28.) The Court has also reviewed both Plaintiff and Defendant's Oppositions. (ECF No. 30-31.) At this time the Court notes that neither of the classes, in the instant action Bui or in the Guilbaud, et al. v. Sprint Nextel Corp. and Sprint/United Management Co., Inc. case, have been certified. The Court finds that staying the mediation is inappropriate at this time. Thus, the Proposed Intervenors' Ex Parte Application is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bui v. Sprint Corporation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Bui v. Sprint Corporation

Case Details

Full title:VIET BUI, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)